LORDS OVER GOD'S
HERITAGE
THE HIGHEST
RANKING men of the Roman Catholic Church, next to the Pope, are a
group of "cardinals." The Bible says that Christ placed
apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors and teachers in his
church (Eph.4:11). But we never find any indication that he
ordained a group of cardinals. To the contrary, the original
cardinals were a group of leading priests in the ancient sun worship religion of Rome -
long before the Christian Era. A booklet published by the
Knights of Columbus, "This is the Catholic Church," explains: "In
ancient times the cardinals were the chief clergy of Rome - the
word is derived from the Latin word 'cardo,' 'hinge', and thus
referred to those who were the pivotal members of the clergy."
But why
were these priests of ancient Rome linked with the word
"hinge"? They were, evidently, the priests of Janus, the sun worship god of doors and
hinges! Janus was referred to as "the god of beginnings" -
thus January, the beginning month of our Roman calendar, comes
from his name. As god of doors, he was their protector or
caretaker. Even today, the keeper of the doors is called a
janitor, a word from the name Janus!
Janus was
known as "the opener and shutter." Because he was worshiped as
such in Asia Minor, we can better understand the words of Jesus to
the church at Philadelphia: "These things saith he that is holy,
he that is true, he that hath the key of David, he that openeth
and no man shutteth: and shutteth, and no man openeth ... I have
set before you an open door" (Rev.3:7,8). The sun worship god Janus was a
counterfeit; Jesus was the true opener and shutter!
"The college of
Cardinals, with the Pope at its head", writes Hislop, "is just the
counterpart of the sun worship
college of Pontiffs, with its Pontifex Maximus, or Sovereign
Pontiff, which is known to have been framed on the model of the
grand original Council of Pontiffs at Babylon!" When sun worship and Christianity
were mixed together, the cardinals, priests of the hinge, that had
served in sun worship
Rome, eventually found a place in Papal Rome.
The
garments worn by the cardinals of the Catholic Church are
red. Cardinal birds, cardinal flowers, and cardinal priests
are all linked together by the color red. The Bible mentions
certain princes of Babylon who dressed in red garments: "...men
portrayed upon the wall, the images of the Chaldeans portrayed
with vermillion" - bright red - "girded with girdles upon the
loins, exceeding in dyed attire upon their heads, all of them
princes to look to, after the manner of the Babylonians of
Chaldea" (Ezekiel 23:14,15). The harlot symbolizing Babylonish
religion was dressed in scarlet - red garments (Rev.17:4).
From ancient times, the color red or scarlet has been associated
with sin. Isaiah, in his day, said: "Though your sins be as
scarlet, they shall be white as snow, though they be red like
crimson, they shall be as wool" (Isaiah 1:18). Adultery is
sometimes referred to as the scarlet sin. The color red is
associated with prostitution, as in the expression "red-light
district."
In view
of these things, it does not seem unfair to question why red would
be used for the garments of the highest ranking men in the Romish
church. We are not saying it is wrong to wear red, yet does
it not seem like a curious custom for cardinals? Are we to
suppose such garments were worn by the apostles? Or is it
more likely that the red garments of the cardinals were copied
from those worn by priests of sun
worship Rome?
The
priests of the hinge in sun worship days were known as the
"Flamens." The word is taken from "flare," meaning one who
blows or kindles the sacred fire. They were the keepers of
the holy flame which they fanned with the mystic fan of
Bacchus. Like the color of the fire they tended, their
garments were flame color-red. They were servants of the
pontifex maximus in sun worship
days and the cardinals today are the servants of the Pope who also
claims the title pontifex maximus. The Flamens were divided
into three distinct groups and so are the cardinals - Cardinal -
bishops, Cardinal - priests, and Cardinal - deacons.
Next in
authority under the Pope and the cardinals are the bishops of the
Catholic Church. Unlike the titles "pope" and "cardinal", the
Bible does mention bishops. Like the word "saints", however,
the word "bishop" has been commonly misunderstood. Many
think of a bishop as a minister of superior rank, having authority
over a group of other ministers and churches. This idea is
reflected in the word "cathedral", which comes from "cathedra,"
meaning "throne." A cathedral, unlike other churches, is the
one in which the throne of the bishop is located.
But
turning to the Bible, all ministers are called bishops--not just
ministers of certain cities. Paul instructed Titus to
"ordain elders in every city" (Titus 1:5), and then went on to
speak of these elders as bishops (verse 7). When Paul
instructed "the elders" of Ephesus, he said: "Take heed unto
yourselves, and to the flock over which the Holy Ghost hath made
you overseers (bishops), to feed (pastor) the church of God" (Acts
20:17,28). The word translated "overseers" is the same word
that is elsewhere translated bishops. The word "feed" means the
same as the word translated pastor. These ministers were
referred to as elders, bishops, overseers, and pastors - all of
these expressions referring to exactly the same office.
Plainly enough, a bishop - in the Scriptures
was not a minister of a large city who sat on a throne and
exercised authority over a group of other ministers. Each
church had its elders and these elders were bishops! This
was understood by Martin Luther. "But as for the bishops that we
now have", he remarked, "of these the Scriptures know nothing;
they were instituted ... so that one might rule over many
ministers."
Even
before the New Testament was completed, it was needful to give
warnings about the doctrine of the Nicolaitines (Rev .2:6).
According to Scofield, the word "Nicolaitines" comes from nikao,
"to conquer", and "laos," "laity", which, if correct, "refers to
the earliest form of the notion of a priestly order, or 'clergy',
which later divided an equal brotherhood (Mt.23:8), into 'priests'
and 'laity'."
The word
"priest" in a very real sense belongs to every Christian believer - not just ecclesiastical leaders.
Peter instructed ministers not to be "lords over God's heritage"
(1 Peter 5:1-3). The word translated "heritage" is "kleeron" and
means "clergy"! As The Matthew Henry Commentary explains,
all the children of God are given the "title of God's heritage or
clergy... the word is never restrained in the New Testament to the
ministers of religion only."
In
rejecting an artificial division between "clergy" and "laity",
this is not to say that ministers should not receive proper
respect and honor, "especially they who labor in the word" (1
Tim.5:17). But because of this division, too often people of a
congregation are prone to place all responsibility for the work of
God upon the minister. Actually God has a ministry for all of his
people. This is not to say that all have a pulpit ministry! -- but
even giving a cup of cold water is not without its purpose and
reward (Matt.10:42). It would be well for each of us to pray,
"Lord, what wilt thou have me to do?" (Acts 9:6). In the New
Testament, the full work of a church was not placed on one
individual. Churches were commonly pastored by a plurality
of elders, as numerous scriptures show. "They ordained
elders (plural) in every church" (Acts 14:19-23) and in "every
city" (Titus 1:5). Expressions such as "the elders (plural) of the
church" are commonly used (Acts 20:17; James 5:14).
All who
have been washed from their sins by the blood of Christ are
"priests unto God" and are "a royal priesthood" (Rev. 1:6; 1 Peter
2:9). The priesthood of all believers is clearly the New Testament
position. But as men exalted themselves as "lords over God's
heritage", people were taught that they needed a priest to whom
they could tell their sins, a priest must sprinkle them, a priest
must give them the last rites, a priest must say masses for them,
etc. They were taught to depend upon a human priest, while
the true high priest, the Lord Jesus, was obscured from their view
by a dark cloud of man-made traditions.
Unlike
Elihu who did not want to "give flattering titles unto man" (Job
32:21), those who exalted themselves as "lords" over the people
began to take unto themselves titles which were unscriptural, and
- in some cases--titles that should belong only to God! As a
warning against this practice, Jesus said, "Call no man your
father upon the earth: for one is your Father which is in
heaven. Neither be ye called masters: for one is your
Master, even Christ. But he that is greatest among you shall
be your servant. And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be
abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted"
(Matt.23:9-12).
It is
difficult to understand how a church claiming to have Christ as
its founder - after a few centuries - would begin to use the very
titles that he said NOT to use! Nevertheless, the bishop of
Rome began to be called by the title "pope", which is only a
variation of the word "father." The priests of Catholicism
are called "father." We will remember that one of the leading
branches of the "Mysteries" that came to Rome in the early days
was Mithraism. In this religion, those who presided over the
sacred ceremonies were called "fathers." An article on Mithraism
in The Catholic Encyclopedia says, "The fathers (used here as a
religious title) conducted the worship. The chief of the fathers,
a sort of pope, who always lived at Rome, was called 'Pater
Patrum'." Now if the sun
worshipers in Rome called their priests by the title
"father", and if Christ said to call no man "father", from what
source did the Roman Catholic custom of calling a priest by this
title come - from Christ or sun
worship?
Even the
Bible gives an example of a sun
worship priest being called "father." A man by the name
of Micah said to a young Levite, "Dwell with me, and be unto me a
father and a priest" (Judges 17:10). Micah was a grown man
with a son of his own; the Levite was "a young man." The title
"father" was obviously used in a religious sense, as a priestly
designation. Micah wanted him to be a father-priest in his
"house of gods." This was a type of Catholicism, for while the
young priest claimed to speak the word of the "LORD" (Judges
18:6), the worship was clearly mixed with idols and sun worship.
The Roman
Catholic Church uses the title "Monsignor" which means "My
Lord." It is somewhat of a general title, The Catholic
Encyclopedia explains, and can be properly used in addressing
several of the higher church leaders. "Instead of addressing
patriarchs as 'Vostra Beautitudine', archbishops as 'Your Grace',
bishops as 'My Lord', abbots as 'Gracious Lord', one may without
any breach of etiquette salute all equally as Monsignor."
One of the meanings of "arch" is master. Using titles such
as archpriest, archbishop, archdeacon, is like saying
masterpriest, etc. The superior of the order of Dominicans
is called "master general." We need only to cite, again, the
words of Christ which are in contrast to such titles: "Neither be
ye called masters: for one is your master, even Christ."
Even the
title "Reverend", Biblically speaking, is applied only to God. It appears one time
in the Bible: "Holy and reverend is his name" (Psalms 111:9). The
word "reverend" comes from the Latin "revere" and was first
applied to the English clergy as a title of respect during the
fifteenth century. Variations of this title are these: The Reverend, The Very
Reverend, The Most Reverend, and The Right Reverend.
In commenting
on the use of these very titles, the noted London preacher, C. H.
Spurgeon, said: "For myself, I
desire to be known henceforth simply as a servant of God, and I
want my walk and conversation to prove that I am His servant
indeed. If I, the servant of God, am to be esteemed
in any measure by my fellow--Christians, it shall not be because
in front of my name, an attribute stolen from God has been placed
by an ordaining council, neither shall it be because my collar is
buttoned at the back, or my coat is clerical in cut, but only for
my work's sake."
When
Jesus spoke against flattering titles, the basic thought was that
of humility and equality among his disciples.
Should we not, then, reject
the supposed authority of those high offices in which men seek
to make themselves "lords over
God's heritage"? And instead of men
receiving glory,
should not all the glory be given to God?
“Signs and symbols rule the Sun Worship world, not
words nor laws.”
www.granddesignexposed.com