Orwell's Jesuit Zionist Blue Print for the NWO
In George Orwell's "1984"
"Jesuit Zionism the root of the NWO"
"Babylonian Connection"
using The Babylonian Talmud.

"It is easier to believe a lie that one has heard a thousand times than to believe a fact that
NO ONE has heard before"  The missing history about Sun Worship!!
 "History is not history unless it is the truth."
Abraham Lincoln
Who controls the past,(Kabbalah) controls the future:(Kabbalah)
who controls the present,(
Kabbalah) controls the past.(Kabbalah)
George Orwell
 It is some sixty years since George Orwell published his prophetic novel, 1984, and in the light of current events it is a perfect time to remind ourselves that we are indeed rapidly heading for the Orwellian nightmare described so brilliantly in his book.  If anyone wants to see the world the Jesuit Zionists want to impose, then just read 1984.

 As Orwell wrote: "if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever". This does not have to come to pass, but it will unless asses and seats part company.  It is already doing so-by the day.  1984, written in 1948, is described as a political satire, but it's not.  It is a political prophecy and there is no way that Orwell could have been so accurate without a deep understanding of the way the world was going, even possibly inside knowledge of what was planned.  Orwell had many contacts in political circles and mixed with the elite from his days at the exclusive Eton College, where royalty is educated.  It is far from impossible that he picked up the threads of what was intended to be.  Orwell also worked for the BBC when it was under the control of ministry of Information, a wonderful Orwellian title in itself for an organization created to communicate dis-information.

Orwell (real name Eric Blair) described a global society of total control in which the people were not even allowed to have thoughts that disagreed with the authorities.  They were subject to the Thought Police who dealt with anyone guilty of thought-crime.  In the Orwellian world, the people were not allowed a personal life and everything they did, or thought, was controlled.  The government, or Part, was headed by "BB", or Big Brother, who appeared on posters everywhere with the words: "Big Brother is watching you".  In the smoke and mirrors society that Orwell describes, Big Brother himself could have been a myth to hide the real controllers, who are controlled by forces that the public have no idea exist.  Orwell's Big Brother may not even have existed, either, but the people were sold the story of his battle to save them from the terrorist, Emmanuel Goldstein, the alleged prime threat to the  'free world'.  Goldstein had been in league with Big Brother during the revolution, the story goes, but he was said to have become a major part of the resistance Brotherhood (al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden and whoever the authorities blame next for their own terrorism).  Orwell implies that Goldstein, too, either does not exist, or was eliminated, but as long as the people believe in his existence and his complicity in terrorism they would support the actions taken by the government to protect them from his terror.

Heard that somewhere before?

Orwell describes the sequence of events that led to the creation of the Big Brother state. A revolution in the United Kingdom turned to civil war and , the same time, the Soviet Union embarked on a mass invasion of mainland Europe, overrunning the entire continent, apart from the British Isles and Iceland.  A Third World War then broke out between the three emerging powers of Oceania (including Britain and led by what had previously been the United States); Eastasia (controlled by a revitalized China); and Eurasia (the expanded Soviet Union).  During this struggle for total power hundreds of atomic bombs were dropped on Europe, western Russia and North America.  Every since the mid-1990s they have been building up China to trigger the imposition of a world government.  This has been happening over the years, and look at the way the media is now full of stories about a 'reviltalised' China and its massive military and economic capability.  The way the world was separated into giant superstates is happening today with the Europe Union, African Union,  the planned American Union and Pacific Union, as you will see later.  The three superstates in 1984 eventually realized that a continuous stalemate war (war on terrorism) was far more effective than victory.  The Constant war kept the people focused and busy manufacturing weapons and goods for the conflict.

The standard of living was appalling because it was understood that a poor (government bank bail out) and needy population was easier to control than a rich and abundant one.  The three superpowers take over most of the world, but leave one region officially 'free' so they have something to fight over.  This 'disputed zone' includes the northern half of Africa, the Middle East, southern India and down towards Indonesia and norther Australia.  The warring factions rarely fight in their own territory.  Airstrip One (the official name for Britain) is apparently the target of Eurasian 'rocket bombs', but it is hinted that the Oceania government is launching these attacks on its own land to convince Airstrip One's urban populations that they are under constant attack ('war on terrorism', 9/11 and the London bombings, etc.).  By the year 1984, Airstrip One becomes a police state and mere province of the enormous Oceania (European Union).  The People are segregated into three classes-the Inner Party, Outer Party and Proles-who are controlled by four ministries housed in massive pyramid structures.  The ministries are named in line with Orwell's law of language manipulation, which he called Newspeak.  This demands that you call everything the opposite of what it actually does.  You can see this technique used throughout society today-remember the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace that was manipulating war?  The Orwellian ministries are:

The Ministry of Peace: its job is to ensure continuous wars.

The Ministry of Plenty: this is responsible for controlling food and goods through rationing.

The Ministry of Truth:  this is in charge of propaganda to stop the people knowing the truth. (ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX and the alphabet Newspeak)

The Ministry of Love:  its role is surveillance, identification of 'dissidents', and their arrest and torture in the infamous Room 101.  This is designed to make them love the government that controls them. Remember in the dark ages, the Inquisition was carried out by civil authorities.  Everything Rome (Vatican) did, was done legally with civil laws.  That is why they passed the " National Defense Authorization Act", that Inquisition and Torture in America is now legal.

Orwell's novel features a character call Winston Smith, a member of the Outer Party, who lives in the ruins of London, the major city of Airstrip One (Britain).  His parents died during the civil war and he is recruited by the 'Ingsoc' (English socialism) movement.  He is given a job with the Ministry of Truth, which controls all media in the Oceania superstate.  One of his roles is to rewrite historical records to comply with the party's version of what happened.  The idea was to make the 'past' conform to the Party's version of what happened.  The  idea was to make the 'past' conform to the political expediency necessary to justify current actions.  Winston wants to know real history and tries to uncover the forbidden truth.  He also keeps an illegal diary of events.  While at the Ministry of Truth, he meets Julia, a mechanic who maintains the 'novel-Writing machines', and they begin an illegal relationship. There was no personal freedom and that included relationships.  Sex for pleasure was discouraged and employed only for the procreation of new members of the Party.  Artificial insemination was the preferred method.  Sexual life was entirely regulated by the two Newspeak words, sexcrime (sexual immorality) and goodsex (chastity).  Sexcrime covered all sexual 'misdeeds', including fornication, adultery, homosexuality and heterosexual intercourse practiced for  its own sake.  They were all punishable by death.  The term, 'sex crime', is now in very days use, of course.

Winston and Julia are forced to meet in the countryside away from the surveillance cameras, and in a room above an antique shop.  Winston begins to question the lies of Ingsoc and the Party structure, and the couple are targeted  by the Thought Police and a member of the Inner Party called O'Brien, who poses as a contact from the Resistance. O'Brien gives him a copy of 'the book', allegedly written by 'terrorist' Emanuel Goldstein, with its exposure of Ingsoc.  Winston and Julia are arrested by the Thought police and taken for interrogation to the Ministry of Love, where dissidents are tortured and executed.  During the torture, O'Brien tells Winston that thy are not interested in securing a false confession,  Instead, the idea is to use torture(the return of the inquisition) and electroshock 'therapy' to change the way he thinks and to 'cure' his hatred of the Party.  This reprogramming is revealed to be successful in the final sentence of the Orwell's book with the words: 'He loved Big Brother'.  Winston also writes that 2+2=5 as confirmation that he has lost control of his own mind.  Interestingly, they use Winston's fear of rats to destroy his feelings for Julia, and this is a major technique use on children and adults in the government mind control projects that turn out millions of mind-slaves to serve the global agenda.  They find out what most terrifies the victim, often a small child, and make them experience it.  This could be a fear of spiders, snakes or in Winston's case, rats.   This state of sheer terror is Manipulated to rewire the mind and its perceptions of reality.  Now this is what was done at 9/11, to put terror,rewire and manipulate millions of mind-slaves to serve the New World Order.

Programming the language
The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words.  If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words.

The theme of 1984 is mass and individual mind control through fear and trauma and the manipulation of language.  The latter is most obviously expressed today through what is called 'political correctness' and 'hate speech', or 'hate crime'.  These terms alone could have been invented by Orwell, who explained how vital language is to perception.  Orwell coined the term, 'Newspeak', for the official language of Oceania and the number of words available was reduced every year-see political correctness, 'hate speech', and the mobile 'phone text 'language', which are fulfilling precisely this role today.  Newspeak was based on the premise that the fewer words that are available, the less efficiently you can articulate your views.  But it went even further.  In this reality, we also think in words and limiting the language available diminishes your ability to even think freely.(I Pod phones) As one Internet article put it:'...Can we communicate the need for freedom, or  organize an uprising, if we do not have the words for either?'  Newspeak was designed to eliminate all meaning from language, leaving only blandness that says nothing, and it replaced the previous vibrant language known as 'Oldspeak'.  This is what is happening today.  The word free still existed in Newspeak, but could only be used in statements like 'the dog is free from lice' or 'this field is free from weeds'.  It could not be used in its old sense of 'politically free' or 'intellectually free', since political and intellectual freedom no longer existed, even as concepts, and were, therefore, nameless.  All words relating to concepts of liberty and equality were contained in the single word, Crimethink, while all words relating to objectivity and rationalism were contained in the single word, Oldthink.  When Tony Blair came to power in the British Labour Party he denounced 'old Labour' and renamed the party 'New" Labour.  With that , all 'old Labour' thinking and language were expunged from debate.

Words that powerfully express the opposite meaning to those promoted in the propaganda are eliminated in the world of 1984.  The opposite of 'good' was 'bad', so bad is replaced by 'ungood'.  Instead of meaningful words like 'best' comes the term 'doubleplusgood'.  Very bad becomes 'doubleplusungood'.  We are seeing the ever-increasing introduction of such meaningless words into our language all the the time to hide the reality of what is happening.  One example of how words are used to obscure the truth is the way that 'civilian casualties' or 'dead people' have become 'collateral damage'.  Labels are also applied to discredit opponents by the implication behind the terms used to describe them.  If you challenge the impositions of the authorities you are an 'anti-government group';  If you suggest, indeed prove, that the government is lying you are a 'conspiracy theorist'.
No words could be so true as these.  Conspiracy theories only remain theories when there is no judge, no court, no legal representative, no assembly, with the valor to expose the evidence.  In every case where the evidence is put into practice, the theory becomes instantly recognizable as a case of criminal conspiracy.

Here are some other examples of language manipulation based on the Politically Incorrect Dictionary. 

News Speak Dictionary click here
Affirmative Action
Implied: Action which is correct ('Affirmative' means correct, and 'Action' is normally good as well).
Actual: Preferential treatment for a particular minority group. {Apartheid was 'affirmative action' for the white minorty.}

American interest
Implied: The interest of Americans.
Actual: The interest of American corporations.  This term is used by politicians who wish to start a war, without explaining the specific reasons why they are doing it.

Department of Defense
Implied: Department concerned with the defense of America's borders.
Actual: Department concerned with maintaining of American 'principles' { 'American interests'}

Free elections
Implied: The masses are free to choose any person they wish to run their government.
Actual: The Masses are free to choose between the two candidates chosen for them.

National security
Implied: The security of the nation.
Actual: The security of those in power to do what they like.

Implied: One who wishes to move this country forward.
Actual: One who wishes to move his country toward state-socialism or fascism (same thing, anyway).

Terrorist attack
Implied: When an evil group ruthless attacks peaceful people for no reason whatsoever.
Actual: When we upset a group so much that they fight back as best they can against our superior forces.  America is a 'good' country, because it bombs the hell out of 'terrorist' nation.

{'Terrorist 'attack' also implies and attack from 'outside' when the most significant ones are attacks orchestrated by internal forces who then condemn 'the terrorists' and blame those they wish to target.} This is exactly what they did with 9/11. The World Intelligences Agency's (control by the Jesuits) drop the buildings using controlled demolition   Mass media condemns the Islamic terrorists so they can target Islamic country's. The 'war on terrorists' is being wagered by Internal forces.  This is nothing new, Rome has always used terror all through her history to implement her agenda for world control and the Jesuits are the foot soldiers.  (More information Jesuit World control)

World Community
Implied: A league of equal states.  Communities are quaint little places where everybody gets along-and wouldn't it be nice if the world was like that?
Actual: Governments that don't stand in the way of US interest. A desire to turn the world into one community which can be centrally controlled.

'Change' is another word spun by the Orwellians.  This is generally used to suggest that a particular idea is good because it is newer; but newer is not  always better.  Nazism and communism were 'change'.  Tony Blair, Barrack Hussien Obama buzz words were always 'change' and 'reform' and they are used in the context that 'change' and 'reform' are, by definition, good, and what they replace is 'bad'.  Then there are the new words, or Newspeak, and the redefinition of words to make people sound 'bad' for having legitimate, often caring, views.  Those who oppose 'globalization'-the centralization of global power and the criminal abuse of poor people countries-are dubbed 'anarchists', or 'anti-capitalist demonstrators' when what they are actually opposing is 'cartelism'.  Someone who thinks differently, or questions the fundamental nonsense of the way the world is run, is called an 'extremist'.(or a Terrorist)  If you resist injustice your are a 'militant'.  A 'peacekeeper' is some one who occupies another country, and the 'peace process'   is the means of placating an oppressed people in an effort to stop them opposing their oppression.  It is  a 'road map' with no destination, because where you want to get is where you already are. 'Western values' are the values that must be imposed on the rest of the world when those 'values are not even applied in the 'West'.  1984 is greater suppression and control until the most extreme of the techniques Orwell described are in place.  In the world of 1984, three Party slogans were displayed to indoctrinate the people. These were:

War is Peace
Freedom is slavery
Ignorance is strength

By no coincidence whatsoever, this is what we are being told endlessly today.  These are expressions of Orwell's doublethink when two apparently contradictory thoughts are both considered to be true.  There are so many modern examples.  Bush and Blair talked about 'fighting for peace' and going to war because they 'want peace'.  Any statement  that includes support for 'fighting' or 'war' cannot be about peace.  It is about fighting and war.  Boy Bush's speechwriters had him say after 9/11:
Quote: George Bush
See, we love-we love freedom.  That's what they didn't understand. They hate things; we love things. They act out of hatred; we don't seek revenge, we seek justice out of love.  You need to tell your loved ones, the little ones in particular, that when they hear the President talking about al-Qaeda, Iraq and other places, I do so because I long for peace.  I want to send the signal to our enemy that you have aroused a compassionate and decent and might nation, and we're going to hunt you down.

When it comes to Orwellian doublespeak or doublethink it doesn't get much better than that.  There is also no debate in Orwell's nightmare society on the grounds that the Party is never wrong-just as Bush and Blair have never been wrong, no matter what the scale of evidence.  As Orwell put it:

Since in reality Big Brother is not omnipotent and the Party is not infallible, there is need for an unwearying, moment-to-moment flexibility in the treatment of facts.  The keyword here is blackwhite. Like so may Newspeak words, this word has two mutually contradictory meanings.  Applied to an opponent, it means the habit of impudently claiming that black is white, in contradiction of the plain facts.  Applied to a Party demands this.  But it means also the ability to believe that black is white, and more, to know that black is white, and to forget that one has ever believed the contrary.

This is what the Jesuits, and other groups and secret societies based on the Jesuits, demand of their initiates.  They must believe what their superiors tell them to believe, no matter what the evidence to the contrary.  St. Ignatious of Loyola: That which appears white is really black. We should always be disposed to believe that which appears white is really black if the hierarchy of the Church so decides. (if Big Brother decides) A text book example of what Orwell writes.   (more on Jesuits)
Orwell wrote:
Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink.  For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth.

By employing doublethink, the Party(government) was able not only to bomb its own people and tell them it was an attack by the enemy, (9/11 inside Job) the Party members (that 19 camel jockeys flew the planes) were indoctrinated to believe that the bombs were launched by the enemy. (a false enemy) Orwell's Big Brother society had another Newspeak word called facecrime, which was the indication that a person was guilty of thoughtcrime, based on their facial expression.  We now have technology and surveillance being introduced to do just that -to study body crimestop, which meant to rid oneself of unwanted thoughts and thus prevent a thoughtcrime or crimethink. Orwell wrote:
Orwell wrote:
The mind should develop a blind spot whenever a dangerous thought presented itself.  The Process should be automatic, instinctive.  Crimestop, they called it in Newspeak.  He set to work to exercise himself in crimestop.  He presented himself with propositions 'the Party says the Earth is flat', 'the Party says that ice is heavier than water'-and trained himself in not seeing or not understanding the arguments that contradicted them.

This applies to anyone who voted for Bush or Blair or supported the invasion of Iraq.  Orwell says that in the last part of the 20th century technology is driven by two things-'war and the desire to determine against his will what another human being is 'thinking'.  This is where we are today with technological innovation that is also motivated by ever more sophisticated methods of control and surveillance.  Orwell writes about the telescreens, and obligatory item in every home which both transmits constant propaganda and has the means to film and record all activity and conversation.  This is the Orwellian vision of telescreen surveillance and  indoctrination:

The telescreen received and transmitted simultaneously.  Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it, moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard.  There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment.  How often, or on what system, the Though Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork.  It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time.  But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to.  You had to live-did live, from habit that became instinct-in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized.

The propaganda part of the telescreen is already well established.  We call it television  and it bombards the collective mind with the official version of life, all day, every day. Fox News, CNN and the BBC are some of the most blatant examples, but the entire mainstream media is pretty much the same.  We may have endless channels, but they are basically the same one, churning out the same unquestioned official line.  'Nonsensical explanations' for events like 9/11 become accepted 'history purely through repetition on the telescreens and in the newspapers (propaganda sheets),and by the suppression of investigation to establish if the official version of events stands  up to scrutiny (creating a false reality).   

No words could be so true as these.  Conspiracy theories only remain theories when there is no judge, no court, no legal representative, no assembly, with the valor to expose the evidence.  In every case where the evidence is put into practice, the theory becomes instantly recognizable as a case of criminal conspiracy

The technology we are allowed to see is light years behind that which actually exists, and the scale of surveillance is already far, far closer to that of Orwell's telescreens than most people begin to realize.  Even with the technology we know about, the reach of surveillance is now incredible.  Walk through a town or city in Britain today and you pass from camera to camera with pretty much your whole journey recorded.  Go into most shops and it's the same, as it is when you take your own money from a ATM.  Virtually everything you do in town or city outside of your home is watched and recorded.  Next it will be inside your home, as Orwell envisaged.  Indeed is it even 'next'?  They are now introducing vehicle technology that logs your every journey in detail, and microchips that can immobilize your engine at will via satellite.  In Britain,'speaking' surveillance cameras are being introduced that allow their operators to give orders to people in the street-just as Orwell's telescreens could.  Everything you do on your computer, where you surf, or what you communicate, is logged.  It is the same with your phone calls.  The laws that allow this to be done legally increased by the month, all justified by the bogus 'war on terrorism', which resulted from the bogus version of what happened on September 11, 2001.  President obama Signed the National Defense Authorization Act in January of 2012 which makes it all legal.  Orwell could hardly have described it any better!!
Orwell talked of the 'proles' or 'proletarians', which made up around 85 per cent of the population.  They were the unthinking masses and the authorities looked upon them as cattle, just as they do today.  They didn't suffer the level of surveillance of those considered intellectually dangerous, because they didn't' question anything.  They were given prolefeed, the brain-numbing 'entertainment' (Hollywood) and made-up 'news' (nightly news) for the masses that kept them dumbed down and incapable of free thought.  Spot on again, it turns out.  There was the unperson, someone removed from circulation and all files until he or she officially ceased to exist (Guantanamo Bay and those who have simply disappeared never to be seen again).  To talk about an unperson was a thought crime, just as to highlight the suffering , indignity and injustice imposed upon the inmates of Guantanamo Bay has been considered to be 'supporting the terrorists'.  Anything in any publication that put the Orwellian government in a bad light was described in Newspeak as malreported or malquoted.  Once again, the authorities were never wrong.  We are now seeing the Orwellian 'anti-terrorism' programmers being introduced to encourage and reward the public to spy on each other, and report their neighbors, workmates, clients and fellow students to the authorities.  All this is straight out of 1984.
    How Orwell could be so prophetic and accurate is less important than the fact that he was.  The solemn mission of this page is to remove the deceptive smokescreen and expose Satan's masterpiece on earth so that you may turn tragedy into triumph and rise to meet the Lord in the air when He returns.
Now for the connection with Rome and American History.  Click here

The Babylonia Talmud is a system of rationalization to
do legally what is forbidden morally

Now if you have followed the above blue print, below is a perfect example of  Newspeak, Doublethink and Jesuit Casuistry.  The below video is from the Rachel Maddow show on MSMBC.  When you understand the Jesuit blue print that is laid out by George Orwell then our foreign policy and the 'war on terrorism' becomes real clear.  They need: The laws that allow this to be done legally increased by the month, all justified by the bogus 'war on terrorism', which resulted from the bogus version of what happened on September 11, 2001.  President obama Signed the National Defense Authorization Act in January of 2012 which makes it all legal.  Orwell could hardly have described it any better!!

Rachel Maddow exposing barack obama the Naked Emperor doublethink!!