"Rulers of Evil" Chapter 22
author Tupper Saussy THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION |
As IF IT WEREN’T enough
that Christopher Columbus had dedicated the New
World to her,
and that Andrew White had dedicated Maryland to her, and that Bishop
Carroll had dedicated his See of Baltimore to her, the 1846
convention of American
Roman Catholic bishops declared the Virgin Mary
to be “Patroness
of the United States.”
The
first two years under her patronage enriched the
national government considerably. The Oregon
territory and the Southwest joined the Union. As did
California, with its bursting veins of gold. The blessings
had their downside, however. They precipitated a
corresponding increase in intersectional tensions that
erupted in a devastating
interstate bloodbath some historians call the Civil War.
In that war, the Patroness of the
United States dealt as cruelly with the enemies of her
protectorate as the vengeful goddess Ishtar did with the
enemies of ancient Babylon.
In
February 1849, “Pio Nono” (the popular name for Pope Pius
IX; there’s a boulevard
named after him in Macon, Georgia) issued an encyclical that
colored America’s Patroness
with the fearsome aspects of Ishtar. The encyclical, entitled Ubi primum (“By whom
at first”), celebrated
Mary’s divinity, saying:
Holy as
she may sound, a
Satan-bashing, life-saving Virgin Mary is a fabrication
of sacred sun worship tradition. The Bible does
prophesy that Satan’s serpentine head will be violated.
But not by Mary.
At Genesis 3:15, we read God’s vow that Satan’s seed will
be bruised by the seed of Eve. It may be argued that Eve’s
seed was Mary.
But according to the inspired understanding of the
apostles, it was Jesus.
At Romans 16:20 Paul promises a Roman congregation that
“the God of peace shall bruise Satan under your feet.” Nor
was Mary given power to deliver people from their enemies.
Only the “one mediator between God and men, the man Christ
Jesus” (1 Timothy 2:5), “a name which is above every
other name” (Philippians 2:9), is a divinely-authorized deliverer.
No, the
Mary of Ubi Primum
will not be found anywhere in the Bible. But then Pio
Nono, the first pope
ever to be declared Infallible, carried about a
rather famous theological ignorance. His private
secretary, Monsignor Talbot, defended Pio’s ineptitude in
a letter cited by Jesuit author Peter de Rosa in his Vicars of Christ:
The truth of the matter, according to J.C.H. Aveling, is
that throughout Pius IX’s long reign (1846-1878), most of his theology was written by Jesuits.
On December 8, 1854, Superior General Beckx brought three
hundred years of Marian devotion to a glorious climax with
Ineffabilis Deus (“God indescribable”), the encyclical
defining the Immaculate
Conception, the extrascriptural doctrine that
Mary, like Jesus, was conceived and remained free of sin:
Ineffabilis Deus mobilized the United States Congress to
pass extraordinary legislation. Congress became suddenly
obsessed with expanding
the Capitol’s dome. According to the official
publication The Dome of the United States Capitol: An
Architectural History (1992), “Never before (or since) has an addition to the
Capitol been so eagerly embraced by Congress.”
Within days of Pio Nono’s definition of the doctrine of Immaculate Conception,
legislation was rushed through Congress that effectively
incorporated the new
Vatican doctrine into the Capitol dome’s crowning
architectural platform, its cupola.
A week
following Ineffabilis Deus Philadelphia architect Thomas
Ustick Walter, a Freemason,
completed his drawings for the proposed dome. It would be
surmounted by a bronze
Marian image which would come to be recognized as
“the only authorized Symbol of American Heritage.”
Her classical name was Persephone,
Graeco-Roman goddess of
the psyche, or soul, and leading deity in the
Eleusinian Mysteries of ancient Greece. Persephone was
abducted by Saturn’s son, Hades, and made queen-consort of
his dominion, the underworld. Persephone was distinguished for her Immaculate Conception
– described by Proclus, head of the Platonic
Academy in Athens during the fifth century of the
Christian era, as “her undefiled transcendency in her
generations.” In
fact, most of the statues of Persephone in the
Christianized Roman Empire had been simply re-identified
and re-consecrated as the Virgin Mary by missionary adaptation.
Congress appropriated $3,000
for a statue of Persephone. President Franklin
Pierce’s Secretary of
War, Jefferson Davis,(Davis suggested the
helmet instead of a Liberty cap, he would soon become
president of the Confederacy) awarded the
commission to a famous young American sculptor named
Thomas Crawford. Crawford lived and worked in Rome. His
reputation had been established with a statue of Orpheus
which, when exhibited in Boston in 1843, was the first
sculptured male nude to be seen in the United States.
Since another of Persephone’s ancient names was Libera
(“Liberty”), Crawford named
his Persephone “Freedom.” His work has worn this title
ever since.
After two years of
labor in the shadow of the Gesu, Crawford completed a
plaster model of Freedom.
Her right hand rested on a sword pointing downward. Her
left hand, against which leaned the shield of the United
States, held a laurel wreath. She was crowned with an
eagle’s head and feathers mounted on a tiara of pentagrams, some
inverted, some not. When ultimately cast in
bronze, Freedom
would reach the height of nineteen feet, six inches – a sum perhaps
deliberately calculated to pay homage to the work’s final
destination, the Beast of Revelation at Lot 666, for nineteen
feet, six inches works out to 6+6+6 feet, 6+6+6 inches.(do the math)
Freedom would stand
upon a twelve-foot iron pedestal also designed by Thomas Crawford. The
upper part of the pedestal was a globe ringed with the
motto of the Bacchic Gospel, E PLURIBUS UNUM, while the
lower part was flanked with twelve wreathes (the twelve
Caesars?) and as many
fascia, those bundles of rods wrapped around
axe-blades symbolizing Roman
totalitarianism.
Crawford wanted his
sculpture to be cast at the Royal Bavarian Foundry in
Munich (where Randolph Rogers’ great ten-ton bronze doors
leading to the Capitol rotunda were cast), while architect
Thomas U. Walter preferred Clark Mills’ foundry, near
Washington. Their transatlantic argument ended abruptly
when Crawford
died in London on September 10, 1857, of a tumor behind
his left eye.
In that same year, 1857,
the United States Supreme Court handed down Dred Scott vs.
Sanford, a decision which most historians agree ignited the Great American
Civil War. The opinion was written by the Roger
Brooke Taney, who succeeded John Marshall as Chief
Justice. A devout
Roman Catholic “under the influence of the Jesuits most of his long life”
according Dr. Walsh’s American Jesuits, Taney held that
Negro slaves and their descendants could never be State
citizens and thus could never have standing in court to
sue or be sued. Nor could they ever hope to be United
States citizens since the Constitution did not create such
a thing as “United States
citizenship.”
Taney’s
opinion was widely suspected of being part of a plot to
prepare the way for a second Supreme Court decision that
would prohibit any state from abolishing slavery. American slavery would
become a permanent institution. This is exactly
what happened, although not quite as everyone supposed it
would. First, slavery was abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment (1865).
Then, the Fourteenth Amendment (1868) created a new national
citizenship. Unlike State citizenship,
which was denied to Negroes, national citizenship was
available to anyone as long as they subjected themselves
to the jurisdiction of the United States-that is, to the
federal government, whose seat is the District of Columbia, “Rome.”
What is so remarkably Jesuitic about the
scheme that proceeded out of Roger Taney’s opinion is
that slavery was sustained by the very amendment that
supposedly abolished it. Amendment Thirteen
provides for the abolition of “involuntary servitude,
except as punishment for crime whereof the party shall
have been duly convicted.” In our time the federally
regulated communications media, with their continually
exciting celebration of violence and drug-use, have subtly
but vigorously induced youthful audiences to play on a
minefield of complementary criminal statutes. The fruit of this
collaboration is a burgeoning national prison population
of men and women enslaved constitutionally.
American slavery has become a permanent
institution.
Reaction to Taney’s decision animated Abraham Lincoln to
immerse himself in abolitionist rhetoric and challenge
Stephen A. Douglas for the Senate in 1858.... MEANWHILE in
Rome, Freedom’s plaster
matrix was packed into five huge crates and
crammed, with bales of rags and cases of lemons, into the
hold of a tired old ship bound
for New York, the Emily Taylor. Early on,
the Emily sprang a leak
and had to put in to Gibraltar for repairs. Once the
voyage was resumed, stormy weather caused new leaks.
Despite attempts to lighten her load by jettisoning the
rags and the citron, things got so bad she put in to
Bermuda on July 27, 1858. The crates were placed in
storage, and the Emily
was condemned and sold.
In
November, Lincoln lost his bid for Douglas’ seat in the
Senate, and in December, another ship, the G.W. Norton,
arrived in New York harbor from Bermuda with some of the
statuary crates. By March 30, 1859 all five crates
had been delivered to the foundry of Clark Mills on
Bladensburg Road, on the outskirts
of the District of Columbia, where the process of
casting the Immaculate
Virgin into bronze and iron was begun.
Lincoln
opposed Stephen Douglas again in 1860, this time for the
Presidency, and this time victoriously. The northern
states rejoiced. The southern states, fearing
Lincoln would abolish slavery, prepared to secede. “The tea has been thrown
overboard!” shouted the Mercury, of Charleston,
South Carolina, capital of American Scottish Rite Freemasonry.
“The revolution of 1860
has been initiated!”
By
Lincoln’s inauguration in March 1861, six states had
seceded from the Union. In April, General Pierre Beauregard, a
Roman Catholic who resigned his Superintendency
of West Point to join the Confederacy, fired on the
United States military enclave at Fort Sumter and
brotherly blood began flowing. Jefferson Davis,
who five years earlier had commissioned Crawford to sculpt the
Immaculate Virgin,
served as President of the rebellious Confederate States of
America. In historian Eli N. Evans’ book on Judah P.
Benjamin, I happened upon a strange and interesting link
between Davis and the
Vatican.
While a young Protestant
student at the Roman Catholic monastery of St.
Thomas College in Bardstown, Davis had pled to be received
into the Catholic faith, but was “not permitted to con-vert.”
He remained “a hazy
Protestant” until his confirmation into the
Episcopal Church at the age of fifty. Despite outward
appearances of rejection, the Confederate President maintained a vibrant
communion with Rome. No one was more aware of
this than Abraham Lincoln. At an interview in the White
House during August 1861, Lincoln confided the following
to a former law client of his, a Roman Catholic priest
named Charles Chiniquy, who published the President’s
words in his own autobiography, Fifty Years In The Church
of Rome:
The
Great Civil War rampaged for another year. In autumn of
1862, the Confederacy’s invasion of the Union was
defeated at the Battle of Antietam in Sharpsburg,
Maryland. As
if in celebration, the Immaculate Virgin was moved from the
foundry and brought to the
grounds of the Capitol construction site. The
lower floors of the building were teeming with the traffic
of a Union barracks and makeshift hospital. Above all this
loomed Thomas U. Walter’s majestic cast-iron dome, patterned after
that of St. Isaac’s
Cathedral in St. Petersburg, Russia.
In
March 1863, Freedom
was mounted on a temporary pedestal, “in order that the
public may have an opportunity to examine it before it is
raised to its destined position,” as stated in Walter’s
Annual Report dated November 1, 1862. One would expect
photographers to be climbing all over themselves to make
portraits of “the only
authorized Symbol of American Heritage” while she
was available for
ground-level examination. America’s pioneer
photographer, Matthew Brady, had shot a comprehensive
record of the Capitol under construction, including
portraits of both Capitol architect Thomas U. Walter and
Commissioner of Public Buildings Benjamin B. French. But
neither Brady nor anyone else photographed Freedom while she
was available for closeups. Why? Was
there a fear that perhaps some Protestant theologian
might raise a hue and cry about the sun worship icon
about to dominate the
Capitol building?
Apparently, not too many Protestants
ever examined Freedom at
ground-level. The District of
Columbia was still virtually a Roman Catholic enclave.
Moreover, the nation in
1863 had been drastically reduced in size. The secession
of the southern states had left only twenty-two northern
states, and these twenty-two were heavily populated by
Catholic immigrants from Europe and Ireland.
“So incredibly large,” we recall from Sydney E. Ahlstrom’s
Religious History of the American People, “was the flow of immigrants
that by 1850 Roman Catholics, once a tiny and ignored
minority, had become the country’s largest religious
communion.” Thus, Crawford’s towering
goddess was being examined mostly by Roman Catholic eyes,
eyes that could not help but see in her the dreadnaught
Mary described by Pius IX in Ubi Primum: “ever lovable, and full
of grace, set up between Christ and his Church, always
delivering the Christian people from their greatest
calami-ties and assaults of all their enemies, ever
rescuing them from ruin.”
The
war rapidly advanced to conclusion while Freedom held forth on
the east grounds of the Capitol. The Union forces under
Burnside lost to Lee at Fredericksburg, but Rosecrans
defeated the Confederates at Murfreesboro, and Grant took
Vicksburg. In summer, Lee’s second attempt to invade
the North failed at Chancellorsville and Gettysburg. By
fall, Grant won the Battles of Chattanooga and
Missionary Ridge with Sherman and Thomas. By the end of November 1863,
the Union had taken Knoxville, and the Confederacy found
its resources exhausted and its cause hopelessly lost.
On November 24, a steam-operated
hoisting apparatus lifted the Immaculate Virgin Mother of God’s first section
to the top of the Capitol dome and secured it. The second
section followed the next day. Three days later, in a
driving thunderstorm, the third section was secured. The
fourth section was installed on November 31.
At quarter past noon December
2, 1863, before an enormous crowd, the Immaculate Virgin’s
fifth and final section was put into place. The
ritual procedure for her installation is preserved in
Special Order No. 248 of the War Department. Her
head and shoulders rose from the ground. The
three-hundred-foot trip took twenty minutes. At the moment
the fifth section was affixed, a flag unfurled above it. The
unfurling was accompanied by a national salute of
forty-seven gunshots fired into the Washington
atmosphere. Thirty-five shots issued from a field
battery on Capitol Hill. Twelve were discharged from the
forts surrounding the city. Reporting the event in the December 10 issue of
the New York Tribune, an anonymous journalist echoed the
qualities that Pius IX had given Mary:
If
Tribune readers felt more nationally united and personally
free because Freedom was
glaring at rebellious
Virginia and outstretching her hand to her
beloved America, they
were deceived. For the goddess faced in precisely
the opposite direction! She
faced east, as she does to this day, faced east across Maryland, the “land of Mary,” across
the Atlantic, toward her
beloved Rome. In fact, neither hand outstretches
in any direction. Both are at rest, one on her sword, the
other holding the laurel wreath. And her forty-seven
Jupiterean thunderbolt-gunshots? They were
a tribute to the Jesuit bishop who had placed the District of
Columbia under her protection. For December 2,
1863 tolled the forty-seventh
year from Jesuit John Carroll’s last full day
alive, December 2, 1815!
ONCE the pressures of
the installation were over, an exhausted but relieved
Capitol Architect Thomas U. Walter wrote his wife, Amanda,
at their Philadelphia home, to say that “her ladyship looks placid and
beautiful – much better than I expected, and I
have had thousands of congratulations on this great event,
and a general regret was expressed that you were prevented
from witnessing this triumph.” Someone else had missed the triumph, too,
someone who by all the rules of protocol should have been
there no matter what: the Commander-in-Chief of the United
States Armed Forces, whose
War Department had engineered the whole Capitol
project from top to bottom–President Abraham
Lincoln. At noon on the day the
temple of federal legislation was placed under the
patronage of Persephone, Freedom, Wife of Hades, Queen
of the Dead, Immaculate
Virgin of Rome, Protectress of the Jesuits, Protectress
of Maryland, and
Patroness of the United
States, the record shows that Lincoln sequestered
himself inside the White House, touched with “a fever.” A telling detail.
But the
sacred iconography
was still not complete. The engineers began now preparing
the interior of the dome, its canopy, for a massive
painting Congress had approved back in the spring of 1863.
This painting would depict George Washington undergoing
the secular version of the canonization of Ignatius Loyola. It
contains even more data useful to our understanding of the
character and provenance of American government. We
examine this masterpiece in our next chapter. Click here
|